Home | Project Information | A UCD Course | UCD Tutorials | UCD Strategies | UCD Tools | UCD Resources | UCD Blog | Evaluate This Website | Skip to Content
Equity and Excellence in Higher Education: Universal Course Design Monitor with Books
Monitor with Books

E & E 2005-2008 Resources
Related Books and Journal Articles
Online Resources
Digital Text Publishers
Resources for Universally Designed Printed Material
Resources for Universaly Designed PowerPoints
Resources for Universally Designed Labs

 

Equity & Excellence in Higher Education 2005 - 2008 Resources:

 

UCD Related Books and Journal Articles:

  • Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. (1996/97). Computer-based concept mapping: Enhancing literacy with tools for visual thinking. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(4), 302-306.

  • Armstrong, T. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Blythe, T., & Associates. (1998). The teaching for understanding guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Also available: https://learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/tfu/info3d.cfm

  • Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Bowe, F. (2000). Universal design in education. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

  • Bowman, S. (2001). How to give it so they get it: A flight plan for teaching anyone anything and making it stick. Glenbrook, NV: Bowperson Publishing.

  • Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for the constructivist classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • CAST eReader. [Computer software]. (1995). Peabody, MA: CAST.

  • CMP (Free-loan media program of over 4,000 open-captioned titles (videos, CD-ROM, and DVD): www.cfv.org/stream.asp

  • Cole, M. (1996). Culture in mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Cole, R.W. (1995). Educating everybody's children: Diverse teaching strategies for diverse learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Cowan, R. S. (1983). More work for mother. New York: Basic Books.

  • Dempster, F. N. (1993). Exposing our students to less should help them learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(6), 432-437.

  • Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1988). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. In J. L. Graden, J. E. Zins, & M. J. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 391-411). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

  • Developing Educational Standards: An annotated list of Internet sites with K-12 educational standards and curriculum frameworks documents. [Online]. Available: https://www.ipl.org/div/subject/browse/edu30.00.00/ [Julyr 15, 2006].

  • Eagleton, M., & Guinee, K. (2002). Strategies for supporting student Internet inquiry. New England Reading Association Journal 38(2): 39-47.

  • Electronic Learning Marketplace: An exchange of ideas and information about assessment and the Maine Learning Results. [Online]. Available: https://www.elm.maine.edu/ [July 15, 2006].

  • Emory University Office of Faculty Resources for Disabilities: Portals and Pathways to Inclusive Instruction www.portals.emory.edu/index.html

  • Faculty and Administrator Modules in Higher Education https://telr.osu.edu/fame/

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.

  • Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind: What all students should understand. New York: Simon & Schuster.

  • Gregory, G.H. & Chapman, C (2002). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

  • Hayes Jacobs, H. (1997). Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment K-12. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Higbee, J.L. (ed.) (2003). Curriculum transformation and disability: Implementing universal design in higher education. Retrieved August 5, 2003, from www.gen.umn.edu/research/crdeul/books.htm

  • Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing New Access to the General Curriculum: Universal Design for Learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8-17. https://cast.org/publications/bycast/index.html

  • Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Technical brief: access, participation, and progress in the general curriculum. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved [June 17, 2006] from https://www.cast.org/publications/ncac/ncac_techbrief.html

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) amendments. [Online]. Available: www.ideapractices.org/ [November 15, 2001].

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67-73.

  • Jorgensen, C. (1998). Restructuring High Schools for All Students: Taking Inclusion to the Next Level. Baltimore, MD: Paul . Brooks Publishing Co.

  • Kendall, J. S., & Marzano, R. J. (1997). Content knowledge: A compendium of standards and benchmarks for K-12 education. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory. Available: www.mcrel.org/standards-benchmarks/

  • Lidz, C. S. (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Lazarro, J. (2001). Adaptive technologies for learning and work environments (ch. 7, 9). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

  • Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333-369.

  • Marr, M. B. (1997). Cooperative learning: A brief review. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13(1), 7-20.

  • Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks. [Online]. Available: www.doe.mass.edu [November 15, 2001].

  • McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media. (New Edition). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Meskill, C. (1999). Computers as tools for sociocollaborative language learning. In K. Cameron (Ed.), CALL: Media, design and applications (pp. 141-164). The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

  • Meyer, A., & O'Neill. L. A. (2000). Supporting the motivation to learn: How Universal Design for Learning can help. Exceptional Parent 30(3): 35-39.

  • Meyer, A., & Rose, D.H. (2000). Universal Design for individual differences. Educational Leadership 58(3): 39-43.

  • Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. [Online]. Available: www.mcrel.org/ [November 15, 2001].

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • New York State Learning Standards. [Online]. Available: www.nysatl.nysed.gov/standards.html [November 15, 2001].

  • O'Neill, L. (2002). Digital literature: How technology and literature-based instruction can support literacy development. Cable in the Classroom 12(11): 6-9.

  • Pisha, B., & Ruzic R. (2001). Learning from a learning disability: What an educational researcher has learned from his own educational experiences. In T.A. Citro (Ed.). Transition skills for post-secondary success: Reflections for high school students with learning disabilities. Weston, MA: Learning Disabilities Association of Massachusetts.

  • Roeher Institute (1996). Building bridges: Inclusive post-secondary education for people with intellectual disabilities. Author: North York, Ontario, Canada.

  • Rose, D., Hasselbring, T. S. et al. (2005). Assistive technology and Universal Design for Learning: two sides of the same coin. In D. Edyburn et al (Eds). Handbook of special education technology research and practice. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design: 549-569.

  • Rose, D. & Meyer, A. (with Stangman, N. & Rappolt, G.) (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved August 5, 2003, from www.cast.org/teachingeverystudent/ideas/tes/

  • Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2000). Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15 (1), 67-70. https://jset.unlv.edu/15.1/asseds/rose.html

  • Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2000). The Future is in the Margins: The Role of Technology and Disability in Edcational Reform. www.cast.org/udl/index.html

  • Russell, M., & Haney, W. (1997). Testing writing on computers: An experiment comparing student performance on tests conducted via computer and via paper-and-pencil. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5(3). Available: https://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v5n3.html.

  • Russell, M., & Haney, W. (2000). Bridging the gap between testing and technology in schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(19). Available: https://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n19.html.

  • Sizer, T. R. (1992a). Horace's school: Redesigning the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Sizer, T. R. (1992b). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. New York: Mariner Books.

  • Springfield Technical College (n.d.). Universal design for access into science, technology, engineering and math. Retrieved August 5, 2003 from https://depts.stcc.edu/ud/

  • The Ohio State University (n.d.). Universal design for learning: Elements of good teaching. Retrieved August 5, 2003.

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (1999a). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (1999b, September). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 12-16.

  • Tomlinson, C. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (ch. 3-4) (2nded.) Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Rosenholtz, S. J. (1991). Teacher's workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

  • UIC Council for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (1998). Excellence in teaching and learning: The interface with technology. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois, Chicago. Retrieved August 5, 2003

  • University of Georgia Department of Instructional Technology: EDIT Studio https://it.coe.uga.edu/studio/studioconcept.html

  • Willis, A. I., & Johnson, J. L. (2000, September). A horizon of possibilities: A critical framework for transforming multiethnic literature instruction. Reading Online, 4(3). Available: www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=/articles/willis/index.html

  • Wolk, R. (1998, November 25). Education's high-stakes gamble. Education Week, 18(15), 48.

back to top

Online Resources:

back to top

 
Home | Project Information | A UCD Course | UCD Tutorials | UCD Strategies | UCD Tools | UCD Resources | UCD Blog | Evaluate This Website
E & E